Saturday, November 28, 2009

Ohio Court: Muslim Unable to Force Daughter into Marriage...


Share/Save/Bookmark


Ohio Court: Muslim Unable to Force Daughter into Marriage...





Judge: Christian's 'arranged' Islamic marriage invalid
Muslim father allegedly assaulted daughter after learning of her conversion

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 28, 2009
12:15 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


A judge in Ohio ruled a marriage arranged by a Muslim father for his 17-year-old daughter who now has converted to Christianity isn't valid, clearing her of accusations she made false statements in applying for a marriage license with the man who now is her husband.

The little-reported case developed in Ohio, where Larry Crain, senior counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, argued on behalf of his client, identified only as "Nishan."

Nishan was married last month to a man she began dating this year when she converted to Christianity, the ACLJ said.

She didn't reveal her conversion to her "devout Muslim family members" until just before the marriage because she feared what they might do.

When her father discovered her plans, he allegedly tried to assault her and then filed a claim that she had falsified her marriage license application because of the earlier arranged marriage.

The ACLJ explained, "Nishan's marriage was arranged by her father during a trip to Karachi, Pakistan, in May 2007 following her graduation from high school. Three days after the 'nikah' ceremony, Nishan and her father returned to the United States.

"She remained confused about the ceremony conducted during her trip to Pakistan and later took precautionary steps to annul her vows by preparing an affidavit for the U.S. consulate in Pakistan in August of 2007," the legal team said. "She gave her affidavit to her father who assured her he would send the necessary paperwork to the consulate. Her family never again mentioned her alleged Paksitani husband and Nishan believed that all necessary steps had been taken to annul any alleged marriage vows."

However, her father's anger over her conversion to Christianity and her marriage included the statement she had falsified her marriage license application in the U.S.

"The fact is that Nishan never knowingly or intentionally misstated her marital status on her application … the fact is that even if Nishian's own attempts to nullify her Pakistani marriage were insufficient, her conversion to Christianity in 2009 effectively annulled her partial marriage pursuant to Islamic law, which provides that if either spouse leaves Islam … and the two never consummated their union, the 'nikah' is immediately annulled," the team explained.

The court listened to testimony from Nishan, her father and the man who claimed to be her Pakistani husband, and said Nishan's version of the events was "credible."

"On cross-examination, the father denied assaulting or abusing his daughter or making any threat to his daughter that a 'fatwa' – an Islamic religious ruling – could be issued against her. In fact, the father told the court that did not know what the term 'fatwa' meant – testimony that the court labeled 'not believable,'" the organization reported.

"This is an important case involving the rights of a former Muslim to accept and convert to Christianity. And this decision no doubt will be watched closely by other Christian converts in this country who cannot publicly testify about their conversion to Christianity for fear of facing retaliation – and even harm – from their own family members," the report said.

Terror bomb blows up Russian train


Share/Save/Bookmark


Terror bomb blows up Russian train






Terror Attack on Nevsky Express Train
Front page / Russia / Politics
28.11.2009 Source:


At least 39 passengers were killed and about 96 were injured when the Nevsky Express train #166 derailed at 18:34 GMT Moscow time at Bologoye, between Moscow and St. Petersburg, an emergencies ministry source said Saturday. The FSB has confirmed that the derailment was caused by a terrorist bomb.



Just prior to the accident, the train driver had applied the brakes. The last four cars out of thirteen left the rails. Witnesses speak of a loud explosion just before the train derailed and claim that a crater with a diameter of one meter appeared in the track.


Aleksandr Bortnikov, Director of the FSB, declared to President Dmitry Medvedev that a bomb with the equivalent of seven kilos of TNT was detonated and caused the incident.


A mobile field hospital was being flown to the accident site, near Bologoye, 200 miles from Moscow, to render assistance to injured passengers. Ambulances, Federal Security Service officers, law enforcement, emergency services and railroad specialists are already at the site.


Thirty injured passengers have been sent to hospitals in Bologoye, Alyoshinka and Borovichi. Another 20 injured were sent to Uglovka. Twenty-three people died instantly and 2 others in hospital. The train was carrying 682 people – 653 passengers and 29 crew – coach attendants and engine drivers.


Russian Railways said trains will move along a bypass route to keep railroad travel between the two largest Russian cities running. Several dozen trains currently on their way to St. Petersburg from Moscow will be delayed by at least 8 hours. It takes Nevsky Express trains, that can travel at 200 kilometers per hour (124 mph), around four hours to travel the approximately 650 kilometers from Moscow to St. Petersburg.

Lisa KARPOVA
PRAVDA.Ru

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Obama bows, the nation cringes


Share/Save/Bookmark


Obama bows, the nation cringes









PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes
By Wesley Pruden
Tuesday, November 17, 2009

OPINION/ANALYSIS

A little traveling, like a little learning, can be a dangerous thing. Barack Obama on the loose in a foreign land is enough to frighten protocol officers and embarrass the rest of us.

He went off to Asia to tell the Chinese a thing or two about world trade, to prepare the world for a treaty to make the sun change its spots, and of course to pay his respects to assorted heads of state, with particular attention to any royal head (perhaps even including Miss Universe) who crosses his path.

So far it's a memorable trip. He established a new precedent for how American presidents should pay obeisance to kings, emperors, monarchs, sovereigns and assorted other authentic man-made masters of the universe. He stopped just this side of the full grovel to the emperor of Japan, risking a painful genuflection if his forehead had hit the floor with a nasty bump, which it almost did. No president before him so abused custom, traditions, protocol (and the country he represents). Several Internet sites published a rogue's gallery showing how other national leaders - the prime ministers of Israel, India, Slovenia, South Korea, Russia and Dick Cheney among them - have greeted Emperor Akihito with a friendly handshake and an ever-so-slight but respectful nod (and sometimes not even that).

Now we know why Mr. Obama stunned everyone with an earlier similar bow to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, only the bow to the Japanese emperor was far more flamboyant, a sign of a really deep sense of inferiority. He was only practicing his bow in Riyadh. Sometimes rituals are learned with difficulty. It took Bill Clinton months to learn how to return a military salute worthy of a commander in chief; like any draft dodger, he kept poking a thumb in his eye until he finally got it. Mr. Obama, on the other hand, seems right at home now giving a wow of a bow. This is not the way an American president impresses evildoers that he's strong, tough and decisive, that America is not to be trifled with.

Some of the president's critics are giving him a hard time, and it's true that this president seems never to have studied much American history. Not bowing to foreign potentates was what 1776 was all about. His predecessors learned with no difficulty that the essence of America is that all men stand equal and are entitled to look even a king, maybe particularly a king, straight in the eye. Can anyone imagine George Washington, John Adams or Thomas Jefferson making a similar gesture of servile submission? Or Harry Truman? Or FDR, who famously served the lowly hot dog, with ballpark mustard, to the king and queen of England? John F. Kennedy, on the eve of a trip to London, sharply warned Jackie not to curtsy to the queen.

Douglas MacArthur, who ranked above mere heads of state in his own mind, once invented his own protocol on greeting Emperor Hirohito. The emperor, the father of Akihito, wanted to meet MacArthur soon after he arrived to become the military regent of Japan in 1945, perhaps to thank him for saving the throne at the end of World War II. When the emperor invited MacArthur to call on him, the general sent word that the emperor should call on him - speaking of breaches of custom - and the two men were photographed together, astonishing the Japanese. The emperor arrived in full formal dress, cutaway coat and all, and MacArthur received him in summer khakis, sans tie, with his hands stuffed casually in his back pockets. Further astonishing the Japanese, he towered over the diminutive emperor.

But Mr. Obama, unlike his predecessors, likely knows no better, and many of those around him, true children of the grungy '60s, are contemptuous of custom. Cutting America down to size is what attracts them to "hope" for "change." It's no fault of the president that he has no natural instinct or blood impulse for what the America of "the 57 states" is about. He was sired by a Kenyan father, born to a mother attracted to men of the Third World and reared by grandparents in Hawaii, a paradise far from the American mainstream.

He no doubt wants to "do the right thing" by his lights, but the lights that illumine the Obama path are not necessarily the lights that illuminate the way for most of the rest of us. This is good news only for Jimmy Carter, who may yet have to give up his distinction as our most ineffective and embarrassing president.

• Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.

Obama popularity below 50% for first time


Share/Save/Bookmark


Obama popularity below 50% for first time





Obama popularity below 50 percent for first time: poll

WASHINGTON (AFP) – President Barack Obama's job approval rating has dipped below 50 percent nationally for the first time, as Americans worry about the war in Afghanistan, a new poll released Wednesday found.

The Quinnipiac University poll showed 48 percent of Americans approve of the way Obama is handling his job as president, compared to 42 percent who disapprove.

The president also scored low marks from Americans on his handling of the situation in Afghanistan, with just 38 percent saying they approved of his approach, but a majority did say it was the "right thing" for US troops to be in the country.

Obama is in the process of picking a new strategy for the conflict in Afghanistan and weighing a request from his top commander in the country, General Stanley McChrystal, for an additional 40,000 troops.

The poll showed Americans favor, by a small margin, the dispatch of those reinforcements to Afghanistan, with 47 percent saying Obama should approve the increase, compared to 42 percent who opposed it.

Whatever strategy Obama picks, Americans are clearly in favor of an approach that targets extremists and oppose attempts at nation-building.

Just 37 percent said "building a stable democratic government" in Afghanistan would be a worthwhile goal for US troops to fight and die for, compared to 65 percent who said "eliminating the threat from terrorists" would be a worthy aim.

As Obama takes his decision on Afghanistan, he has emphasized the need to ensure an exit strategy, and Americans expressed little appetite for extending US involvement in the country indefinitely.

Just two percent were willing to see US troops remain there for five to 10 years, with 31 percent preferring to see American soldiers return home within the year, but another 27 percent say they would be willing to extend the commitment for "as long as it takes."

Of the 2,518 voters polled by Quinnipiac, 53 percent said they trust Obama to make the right decision about troop levels in Afghanistan

Government wastes $98 billion in taxpayer dollars in 2009


Share/Save/Bookmark


Government wastes $98 billion in taxpayer dollars in 2009






Updated November 17, 2009
Gov't Wastes $98B in Taxpayer Dollars in 2009
by AP

About 5 percent of spending in federal programs in fiscal year 2009 was improper, according to new details of a government financial report that were released Tuesday.

WASHINGTON -- More than $98 billion in taxpayer dollars spent by government agencies was wasted, much of it on questionable claims for tax credits and Medicare benefits, representing an increase of $26 billion from the previous year.

In all, about 5 percent of spending in federal programs in fiscal year 2009 was improper, according to new details of a government financial report that were released Tuesday. Saying the overall error rate was similar in 2008, officials attributed the $26 billion jump to some changes in how to define improper spending as well as an increase in overall spending due to the recession.

President Barack Obama is expected to sign an executive order within the next week aimed at cracking down on government waste and fraud, particularly in Medicare and other benefit programs. In the 2009 report, the government officially reported questionable Medicare payments of roughly $36 billion, but that amount will be revised upward to about $48 billion next year as the Health and Human Services Department fully converts to a new methodology that imposes stricter documentation requirements.

"We need to protect taxpayer dollars," Peter Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget, told reporters. "Every dollar that goes to the wrong recipient or in the wrong amount is a dollar not available to help an unemployed worker, or to invest in education or key priorities of the administration."

Under the executive order, every federal agency would have to maintain a Web site that tracks improper payments, error rates and outstanding payments. If an agency doesn't meet targets for reducing error rates for two years in a row, the agency director and responsible official will have to directly report to OMB to explain the delinquency and new actions they will take.

The Obama administration will also seek to impose penalties on government contractors that receive improper payments so they have incentives to return the money, Orszag said.

Among the reported waste:

--Agriculture: $4.3 billion in improper payments, or 5.9 percent of total department spending. Much of it was in the food stamp, federal crop insurance and school meals programs.

--Defense: $849 million, or 0.5 percent.

--Education: $599 million, or 2.1 percent.

--Health and Human Services: $55.1 billion, or 9.4 percent. That included improper payment rates of 7.8 percent and 15.4 percent in the Medicare fee for service and Advantage programs, respectively.

--Homeland Security: $644.5 million, or 3.7 percent. Much of it was in the Homeland Security grant program as well as Disaster Relief Fund Vendor Payments.

--Housing and Urban Development: $1 billion, or 3.5 percent. All of it was attributed to public housing and rental assistance.

--Labor: $12.3 billion, or 9.9 percent. Almost all of the improper payments were in the unemployment insurance program.

--Treasury: $12.3 billion, or 25.5 percent. All of it was attributed to improper payments in the earned income tax credit.

--Transportation: $1.5 billion, or 3 percent. Much of it was in the Federal Highway Administration planning and construction program.

--Veterans Affairs: $1.2 billion, or 2.7 percent. That included improper payments in the pension and other compensation programs.

--Social Security Administration: $8.0 billion, or 1.2 percent.

Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., who chairs a Senate panel on federal financial management, said he worried that the latest numbers "may still be just the tip of the iceberg" since they don't include estimates for several programs such as the Medicare prescription drug plan.

"It goes without saying that these results would be completely unacceptable in the private sector, as they should be in government, especially at a time of record deficits," Carper said.

Monday, November 16, 2009

(Australia) Father Kills Boy with Steak Knife, Utters 'Allah'...


Share/Save/Bookmark


(Australia) Father Kills Boy with Steak Knife, Utters 'Allah'...





Father 'killed son with steak knife'GABRIELLE KNOWLES, The West Australian
November 11, 2009, 11:26 am

A father probably killed his son with a steak knife, uttered Allah's name and dropped the three-year-old down a disused mine shaft, the South Australian Supreme Court has been told

Prosecutors in the case involving Aliya Zilic said that he had taken the boy, Imran, 3½, from his mother's Perth home a few days earlier.

Mr Zilic is on trial accused of murdering his only son during an access visit in April 2008.

He has pleaded not guilty by reason of mental incompetence.

Horrific details of the youngster's final moments emerged in the court, with prosecutor Jim Pearce saying it was likely Mr Zilic had killed his son with a steak knife before dropping him down the 7m disused shaft.

Mr Pearce said the accused had told police: 'I killed him, does it matter how?' and 'I said Allah's name and dropped him in the shaft'.

The court was told Mr Zilic had an extensive history of mental health problems and psychiatrists would be called to give evidence about his mental competency at the time of the alleged murder.

During his relationship with Mirsada Halilovic he had allegedly "used and abused" amphetamines and cannabis. The couple eventually separated because Mr Zilic was domineering, abusive and had been physically violent, the court was told.

Mr Pearce said he accused Ms Halilovic of being a whore who was possessed by demons and was working for the devil.

Ms Halilovic allowed her ex-husband to see his son, although she did not like Mr Zilic to take him for overnight visits.

Mr Zilic allegedly arrived at her Koondoola home unannounced about 6am on Sunday, April 20, 2008.

He told his ex-wife he missed his son and wanted to take him to stay at his brother's for a few days. The court was told he quickly rushed out without taking any clothes for the youngster.

It would be the last time Ms Halilovic saw her son alive.

Mr Pearce told the court Mr Zilic had then left Perth and headed to the South Australian town of Coober Pedy, 800km north of Adelaide, where he had been renting a unit.

There were sightings of the pair at businesses across WA and SA.

Ms Halilovic repeatedly tried to call her ex-husband that day and the next and found out his brother had not seen him.

He eventually answered his phone on the evening of April 21 and she spoke briefly to her son. But it will be alleged she called police when his father did not return him as promised the next day.

Prosecutors allege Mr Zilic killed his son on April 22 or 23, soon after arriving in Coober Pedy. The court was told he then left South Australia and headed to WA, to the north-west town of Kununurra.

Police searching for Imran questioned Mr Zilic in Kununurra. The court heard he initially told them he had taken his son back to his ex-wife but, after several interviews with detectives, he eventually admitted killing Imran and described where he had left his body.

He allegedly told police he left the child “in the hands of God”.

“He described how he thought Imran was the devil’s helper and he now thought that Imran was at peace with God,” the prosecutor said.

The trial is being held in South Australia because that is where Imran was found.

Ft. Hood Shooter a Big Fan of Sharia Law...


Share/Save/Bookmark


Ft. Hood Shooter a Big Fan of Sharia Law...





Classmates: Hasan defended suicide bombings, held Islamist views
November 12, 2009 10:51 p.m. EST

Fort Hood, Texas (CNN) -- Those who knew Nidal Malik Hasan before he was a major in the Army -- and the suspect in last week's mass killing at Fort Hood -- say he was long known for militant Islamist views.

Doctors who crossed paths with Hasan in medical programs paint a picture of a subpar student who wore his religious views on his sleeve.

Several doctors who knew Hasan spoke to CNN, but only on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation of the shooting, which left 12 soldiers and one civilian dead and dozens of other people wounded.

Hasan, an Army psychiatrist who faces 13 counts of premeditated murder, "was clearly espousing Islamist ideology" during his time as a medical student at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland, one of his former classmates told CNN.

Hasan's family has revealed little about him, saying in media interviews that Hasan was a "good American" and a lifelong Muslim who complained he was harassed in the Army because of his religion.


His former classmates describe a much more militant Hasan.

His presentations for school were often laced with extremist Muslim views, one source said.

"Is your allegiance to Sharia law or the United States?" students once challenged Hasan, the source said.

"Sharia law," Hasan responded, according to the source.

The incident was corroborated by another doctor who was present.

The source recalled another instance in which Hasan was asked if the U.S. Constitution was a brilliant document. Hasan replied, "No, not particularly," according to the source.

The former classmate told CNN that he voiced concerns about Hasan to supervisors at the school.

A second former medical school colleague of Hasan said several people raised concerns about Hasan's overall competence.

Even though Hasan earned his medical degree and residency, some of his fellow students believed Hasan "didn't have the intellect" to be in the program and was not academically rigorous in his coursework.

Hasan "was not fit to be in the military, let alone in the mental health profession," this classmate told CNN. "No one in class would ever have referred a patient to him or trusted him with anything."

The first classmate echoed this sentiment.

Hasan was "coddled, accommodated and pushed through that masters of public health despite substandard performance," the classmate said. He was "put in the fellowship program because they didn't know what to do with him."

The second classmate said he witnessed at least two of Hasan's PowerPoint discussions that included what he described as extremist views.

In these presentations, which were supposed to be about health, Hasan justified suicide bombings and spoke about the persecution of Muslims in the Middle East, in the United States and in the U.S. military, the source said.

Some in the crowd rolled their eyes or muttered under their breath, he said, and others were clearly uncomfortable.

Those in the audience, which included program supervisors, did not loudly object to Hasan's presentations, but did complain to their higher-ups afterward.

The supervisors expressed "appreciation, understanding and agreement" that the complaints would be discussed, but it was unclear what action, if any, came, the source said.

When the classmate challenged Hasan personally, Hasan dodged the questions, the source said.

Despite the controversy that his schoolwork created, classmates did not view Hasan as mentally unstable or psychotic, the source said.

Questions remain over how much Hasan's behavior and actions in school were reflected in his personnel files.

Col. Kimberly Kesling, deputy commander of Clinical Services for Darnell Medical Center at Fort Hood and Hasan's supervisor at the post, told reporters last week that Hasan was doing a good job in Texas.

"As a supervisor, I am aware of the job performance of people coming into our organization, that is part of our credentialing process," Kesling said. "The types of things that were reported to me via his evaluation report were things that concerned me, but did not raise red flags toward this [the shootings] in any way, shape, or form."

"His evaluation reports said that he had some difficulties in his residency, fitting into his residency, and we worked very hard to integrate him into our practice and into our organization, and he adapted very well, was doing a really good job for us," she said.

Prompted by reports of former classmates, however, Army investigators would like to speak with people who have had contact with Hasan and who may have information about his activities and behavior, Maj. Gen Kevin Bergner, head of U.S. Army public affairs, said.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates weighed in on the information surfacing about Hasan.

"I deplore the leaks that have taken place," he said on a trip to Oshkosh, Wisconsin. People are talking about "what they know, which is one small piece of the puzzle."

"They don't know whether or not what they're leaking might jeopardize a potential criminal investigation and trial," he said.

"People who have a piece of this, frankly, ought to keep quiet and let the authorities go forward on this in an organized and comprehensive way," Gates said.

Hasan came under investigation last year when his contacts with radical imam Anwar al-Awlaki were intercepted by terrorism investigators monitoring the cleric's communications, a federal law enforcement official told CNN.

An employee of the Defense Department's Criminal Investigative Services, assigned to the Joint Terrorism Task Force, decided to drop the investigation after reviewing the intercepted communications and Hasan's personnel files.

Hasan remained hospitalized Thursday from gunshot wounds he received from two police officers who responded to last week's shooting.

Girl's Throat Slit over Rejected Marriage Proposal...


Share/Save/Bookmark


Girl's Throat Slit over Rejected Marriage Proposal...





Man kills girl for not marrying him
Friday, November 13, 2009

LAHORE: A man slaughtered a girl after her parents did not agree to their marriage in Shafiqabad police precincts on Thursday. According to police, the accused, Irshad, wanted to marry Shamim and had been asking her parents for a long time. The girl’s father, Malik Fazal Elahi, a resident of Bund Road, refused to get his daughter married to him. On Wednesday, he entered the girl’s house in the absence of other family members. Upon his failure to convince her for marriage, Irshad attacked her with a dagger and slit her throat. Shafiqabad police has registered the complaint against the accused and have started the investigation. The police also sent the body to the morgue for autopsy. staff report

Hasan Told Colleagues They Would 'Burn in Hell'...


Share/Save/Bookmark


Hasan Told Colleagues They Would 'Burn in Hell'...





Officials: Major Hasan Sought 'War Crimes' Prosecution of U.S. Soldiers
Rebuffed, Accused Fort Hood Shooter Took Extra Target Practice, Closed Bank Safety Deposit Box in Final Days, Investigators Say
By JOSEPH RHEE, MARY-ROSE ABRAHAM, ANNA SCHECTER, and BRIAN ROSS
Nov. 16, 2009 —


Major Nidal Malik Hasan's military superiors repeatedly ignored or rebuffed his efforts to open criminal prosecutions of soldiers he claimed had confessed to "war crimes" during psychiatric counseling, according to investigative reports circulated among federal law enforcement officials.

On Nov. 4, the day after his last attempt to raise the issue, he took extra target practice at Stan's shooting range in nearby Florence, Texas and then closed a safe deposit box he had at a Bank of America branch in Killeen, according to the reports. A bank employee told investigators Hasan appeared nervous and said, "You'll never see me again."

Diane Wagner, Bank of America's senior vice president of media relations, said that her company does not "comment or discuss customer relationships" but is "cooperating fully with law enforcement officials."

Investigators believe Hasan's frustration over the failure of the Army to pursue what he regarded as criminal acts by U.S. soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan may have helped to trigger the shootings.

"The Army may not want to admit it, and you may not hear much about it, but it was very big for him," said one of the federal investigators on the task force collecting evidence of the crime.

His last effort to get the attention of military investigators came on Nov. 2, three days before his alleged shooting spree, according to the reports.



Colonel Anthony Febbo at Fort Hood reportedly told investigators he was twice contacted by Hasan, on Nov. 2 and a week earlier in October, about the question of whether he could legally provide information on "war crimes" he had learned in the course of psychiatric counseling he provided soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Col. Febbo told ABC News he could not comment because of the on-going investigation.

His supervisor in the Department of Psychiatry, Captain Naomi Surman, told investigators that Hasan raised similar issues with her in conversations in October, according to documents reviewed by ABC News.

Captain Surman told investigators that Hasan had formally contacted military prosecutors to report patients he was evaluating, according to people briefed on the exchange. She said Hasan signed his e-mails with "Praise Be to Allah." Legal analysts say psychiatrists are strictly bound by the rules of patient confidentiality except in cases where they might become aware of crimes about to be committed.

Alleged Ft. Hood Shooter Unhappy With Military, Co-workers Said
Captain Surman, who was scheduled to be deployed to Afghanistan with Hasan on Nov. 2 told investigators that Hasan had both social and academic issues in his medical training. She said that on one occasion, Hasan told her she was an infidel who would be "ripped to shreds" and "burn in hell" because she was not Muslim.

An Army spokesperson contacted by ABC News declined to discuss Hasan's possible motives for the massacre.

"There is an ongoing criminal investigation into the incident at Fort Hood on November 5," said Col. Catherine Abbott. "We cannot speculate as to any potential motive by the alleged suspect."

"This information will come to light as part of the ongoing investigation."

According to fellow military doctors, Hasan made no secret over the last two and a half years about his growing disenchantment with the Army and the American military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Employees at the shooting range where Hasan practiced just two days before the massacre told investigators that Hasan purchased ten separate targets and fired more than 200 rounds with his newly purchased semi-automatic pistol.

After buying the gun in August from a Killeen store called Guns Galore, Hasan later returned to purchase 13 separate ammunition magazines capable of holding up to 30 bullets each.

Store employees told investigators that they became suspicious of Hasan's purchase of so many extra ammunition magazines. The employees said Hasan claimed he needed the extra magazines so he would not have to reload when he fired at the practice range.

Senate panel postpones Fort Hood hearing at request of White House


Share/Save/Bookmark



Updated November 16, 2009
Senate Committee Postpones Fort Hood Hearing At Request of White House
by
FOXNews.com




An aide to Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the committee's Monday briefing on the Fort Hood tragedy is postponed "at the request of the administration" (Reuters).


The Senate Armed Services Committee postponed its Monday briefing on the deadly Fort Hood massacre at the request of the White House -- despite calls from some lawmakers to press forward with a congressional investigation into the shooting rampage that killed 13 and wounded 29.


The Senate Armed Services Committee postponed its Monday briefing on the deadly Fort Hood massacre at the behest of the White House, despite calls from some lawmakers to press forward with a congressional investigation into the shooting rampage that killed 13 and wounded 29.

An aide to committee chairman Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., told Fox News that the meeting is delayed "at the request of the administration." Army Secretary John McHugh and Army Chief of Staff Gen George Casey were to have briefed committee members privately on the shooting.

Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was charged on Thursday with the deadly shooting spree. Army investigators have said Hasan is the only suspect and could face additional charges.

Obama already had ordered a review of all intelligence related to Hasan and whether the information was properly shared and acted upon within government agencies. Several members of Congress, particularly Rep. Peter Hoekstra, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, have also called for a full examination of what agencies knew about Hasan's contacts with a radical Muslim cleric in Yemen and others of concern to the U.S.

Hoekstra confirmed this week that government officials knew of about 10 to 20 e-mails between Hasan and Anwar al-Aulaqi, beginning in December 2008.

A joint terrorism task force overseen by the FBI learned late last year of Hasan's repeated contact with the cleric, who encouraged Muslims to kill U.S. troops in Iraq. The FBI said the task force did not refer early information about Hasan to superiors because it concluded he wasn't linked to terrorism.

Department of Defense spokesman Gary Comerford declined to confirm Monday whether the department is conducting its own investigation, referring Fox News to speak with the department's head of public affairs.

In a video and Internet address released by the White House on Saturday, President Obama urged Congress to hold off on any investigation of the Fort Hood rampage until federal law enforcement and military authorities have completed their probes into the shootings.

While on an eight-day trip to Asia, Obama called on lawmakers to "resist the temptation to turn this tragic event into the political theater."

"The stakes are far too high," he said. "There is an ongoing investigation into this terrible tragedy. That investigation will look at the motives of the alleged gunman, including his views and contacts.

"We must compile every piece of information that was known about the gunman, and we must learn what was done with that information. Once we have those facts, we must act upon them," he added.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, speaking to reporters aboard his plane last week, said all those privy to details on the ongoing investigation into the shooting "should just shut up."

But Sen. Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said he will proceed with his committee's investigation into the shooting, saying Obama did not indicate on Saturday that it should push back Thursday's scheduled testimony.

"We saw nothing in the president's transcript from Saturday that asked Congress to hold back," an aide speaking on condition of anonymity told Fox News.

"We very much agree with President Obama's sentiments that the full story behind the murderous act at Fort Hood must be told," Lieberman along with Maine Sen. Susan Collins, the ranking Republican on the committee, said in a joint statement over the weekend. "Our goal, and the purpose of this inquiry, is to make as certain as possible that no such attack ever occurs again on an American military base. We will focus on national and homeland security and will not compromise the criminal case being conducted by law enforcement."

Fox News' Trish Turner and Justin Fishel and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

Man accused of setting wife, children on fire


Share/Save/Bookmark


Man accused of setting wife, children on fire





Fair Haven woman set on fire
Published: Monday, November 16, 2009

By Mark Zaretsky and Bill Kaempffer, Register Staff

NEW HAVEN — A 35-year-old Fair Haven woman was in critical condition with burns over 30 percent to 40 percent of her body, and her husband was charged by police after he allegedly doused the woman and her two children with an accelerant Sunday morning and set the woman on fire, police said. Both children escaped injury.

Flames also damaged much of the second and third floors of the house they lived in at 14 Market St. near Monroe Street, resulting in a two-alarm fire, said Fire Marshal Joe Cappucci. The second and third floors were one apartment, Capucci said.

Howard Stewart, 50, 14 Market St., was arrested by police in the area of James Street and Grand Avenue after running out of the house. According to one source, when Stewart saw police, he told them, “If you’re going to 14 Market St., I’m the one responsible.”

Held in lieu of $1 million bail Sunday, Stewart is charged with first-degree arson; first-degree assault; two counts of criminal attempt to committ first-degree assault; two counts of risk of injury to a minor; and first-degree criminal mischief. The investigation is ongoing, police said.

The victim, Christina Lee, was in critical condition in the burn unit at Bridgeport Hospital.

The incident took place about 7:45 a.m. Firefighters arrived to find fire shooting through the roof and heard the screams of Lee, authorities said. Market Street runs parallel to Grand Avenue and Lombard Street, between the two, stretching from John Murphy Drive to Monroe Street.

“We’re still working our way toward cause and origin,” said Capucci.

Authorities said the problems began Saturday night with a fight over family issues.

Lee’s 12-year-old daughter, and the 3-month-old daughter of Lee and Stewart were uninjured and staying with their mother’s parents, police and neighbors said.

The older daughter initially ran from the house and, according to the owner of the house, also rescued the infant from her crib and brought her out.

According to police, the 12-year-old daughter awoke Sunday when a liquid was thrown on her and she saw Stewart trying to light a lighter. But the daughter ran down the rear steps and out the back door with him chasing her.

Then Stewart allegedly went back upstairs and used an accelerant to light Lee on fire. Lee then ran down the front steps with Stewart in pursuit. Her daughter, meanwhile, ran back up the rear steps and rescued her 3-month-old sister. Then the daughter ran down the front steps past her mother, who was still on fire.

Neighbors on the first floor heard the confrontation and called police, then tended to Lee and covered her after she ran downstairs, said the three-story house’s owner, who declined to be identified by name.

She identified the woman living on the first floor as Joanne Ragland and said Ragland and her husband gave Lee assistance.

Both Ragland and her husband declined to comment at the scene. They were given emergency shelter in a New Haven motel.

“It was just a blessing that there was someone on the first floor who could help her,” said the house’s owner.

At one point, she joined hands with three well-dressed men who turned up along the street, and the three prayed together.

While Ragland and her husband aided Lee, “basically, the victim (Lee) saved their lives” by waking them up and alerting them to the fact that the building was on fire, “because everybody was sleeping,” the owner said.

Neighbors said that while Market Street is part of a larger Fair Haven neighborhood that sees its share of trouble, it generally is a pretty quiet street. Several people said they were shocked to see that kind of thing take place.

“I pretty much came home to a fire investigation,” said neighbor Willie Hardy, who lives across Market Street from the house where the fire occurred. But he said he did not initially know how the fire started.

“From what you’re telling me, it’s a lot worse than I thought,” he said. “This particular street is pretty quiet ... so it’s really a shock to hear.”

He said he had met Stewart and Lee briefly and “I didn’t see them as the type of people” who would be involved in something like that.

“It normally has been very quiet” in the neighorhood, said Bruce Loyd, a former resident of Market Street for 14 years who was back on the street visiting his two sisters-in-law.

“Things could happen anywhere, the way this world is,” Loyd said. “You never know what’s going to send somebody over the edge.”

At one point, investigators had several cans of what appeared to be either paint or paint thinner out on the sidewalk in front of the house and were comparing what was in them to clothing they had removed from the house.

Mark Zaretsky can be reached at mzaretsky@nhregister.com or 203-789-5722. Bill Kaempffer can be reached at wkaempffer@nhregister.com or 203-789-5727.

Obama intel pick accused Jews of assassination


Share/Save/Bookmark



Obama intel pick accused Jews of assassination
Lauded Iranian nuclear program as 'deterrent' against Israel, Bush

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 15, 2009
8:14 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2009 WorldNetDaily




Charles Freeman

TEL AVIV – The Obama administration's withdrawn nominee for a top intelligence post delivered a speech to a pro-Arab U.S. group in which he claimed that Israel has long assassinated peace-loving Palestinian leaders.

He also falsely accused the Jewish state – which doesn't publicly comment on its alleged nuclear weapons program – of threatening to nuke Iran.

Charles "Chas" Freeman, the U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf War, used the speech to suggest that America was attacked on 9/11 largely due to its support for Israel.

He further stated that if the White House attempts to pressure Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's "American lobby" will arrange for Congress to punish President Obama.

Freeman was slated to head the National Intelligence Council but withdrew his nomination in March following revelations – some first reported at WND – that he has financial ties to the infamous bin Laden family and that he sits on the board of a major oil company owned by the Chinese government that had been in the midst of a multibillion-dollar deal with Iran that may violate U.S. sanctions.

WND also reported that Freeman once peddled a Saudi-funded book to U.S. public schools that falsely claims Muslims inhabited North America far before European explorers.

On Oct. 16, Freeman delivered a speech to the 18th Annual Arab-U.S. Policymakers Conference run by the National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations, which defines itself as a nongovernmental organization dedicated to "improving American knowledge and understanding of the Arab world."

During this speech, Freeman referred to the government here as "Israeli occupation authorities" and claimed an "Israeli cabinet-directed assassination campaign has long focused on ensuring that there is no one to talk to on the Palestinian side."

He slammed the State Department's labeling of Hamas as a terrorist organization. The radical Palestinian group's charter calls for the murder of Jews and destruction of Israel. Hamas is responsible for scores of suicide bombings, shootings and rocket attacks against Jewish civilian population centers.

Freeman claimed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict began as a problem between "Jewish colonists and indigenous Arabs" even though Jews had historically lived in the territory that became modern-day Israel for thousands of years, while many Palestinian Arabs arrived originally as migrant workers when the Jewish population started to increase in 1881.

Freeman claimed that Israel threatened to nuke Iran, stating: "Tehran seems on track to acquire the ability to field its own deterrent to the threats of nuclear attack Iranians have serially heard from Saddam's Iraq, successive Israeli governments and George Bush's America."

Israel, however, refuses to address the issue of its alleged nuclear arsenal. Israel has never threatened a nuclear attack against any country. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, meanwhile, has threatened to wipe Israel off the map.

Of the Sept. 11 attacks, Freeman claimed, "The 9/11 assault on the United States was carried out by Muslim extremists motivated in large measure by their resentment of U.S. support for Israel and its actions."

Al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden has referred to U.S. support for Israel, but his main grievance has long been U.S. troop presence in the Middle East. Additionally, al-Qaida leaders have addressed their primary need to spread Islam around the world though jihad.

Freeman claimed the current Netanyahu government of Israel "rejects trading land for peace" even though the Israeli leader has multiple times called for the renewal of negotiations with the Palestinians. Additionally, it was Netanyahu who signed the 1998 Wye River Memorandum, which provided PLO leader Yasser Arafat with strategic territory in the West Bank.

Freeman went on to accuse Netanyahu of being "confident that his American lobby will arrange for Congress to punish the president if the president tries to punish Israel for its intransigence."



U.S. troops battle both Taliban and their own rules


Share/Save/Bookmark







Originally published 05:45 a.m., November 16, 2009, updated 12:21 p.m., November 16, 2009
U.S. troops battle both Taliban and their own rules

Sara A. Carter

KASHK-E-NOKHOWD, Afghanistan | Army Capt. Casey Thoreen wiped the last bit of sleep from his eyes before the sun rose over his isolated combat outpost.

His soldiers did the same as they checked and double-checked their weapons and communications equipment. Ahead was a dangerous foot patrol into the heart of Taliban territory.

"Has anyone seen the [Afghan National Army] guys?" asked Capt. Thoreen, 30, the commander of Blackwatch Company, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment with the 5th Stryker Brigade. "Are they not showing up?"

A soldier, who looked ghostly in the reddish light of a headlamp, shook his head.

"We can't do anything if we don't have the ANA or [the Afghan National Police]," said a frustrated Capt. Thoreen.


"We have to follow the Karzai 12 rules. But the Taliban has no rules," he said. "Our soldiers have to juggle all these rules and regulations and they do it without hesitation despite everything. It's not easy for anyone out here."

"Karzai 12" refers to Afghanistan's newly re-elected president, Hamid Karzai, and a dozen rules set down by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the commander of U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan, to try to keep Afghan civilian casualties to a minimum.

"It's a framework to ensure cultural sensitivity in planning and executing operations," said Capt. Thoreen. "It's a set of rules and could be characterized as part of the ROE," he said, referring to the rules of engagement.

Dozens of U.S. soldiers who spoke to The Washington Times during a recent visit to southern Afghanistan said these rules sometimes make a perilous mission even more difficult and dangerous.

Many times, the soldiers said, insurgents have escaped because U.S. forces are enforcing the rules. Meanwhile, they say, the toll of U.S. dead and injured is mounting.

By mid-November, Capt. Thoreen's unit had lost five soldiers to suicide bombings and improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Many more had been wounded and three of their Stryker vehicles had been destroyed.

In his Aug. 30 assessment of the situation in Afghanistan, which was leaked to the press, Gen. McChrystal said that the legitimacy of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) had been "severely damaged … in the eyes of the Afghan people" because of "an over-reliance on firepower and force protection."

To succeed, he wrote, "ISAF will have to change its operating culture to pursue a counterinsurgency approach that puts the Afghan people first." This entails "accepting some risk in the short term [but] will ultimately save lives in the long term."

The Times compiled an informal list of the new rules from interviews with U.S. forces. Among them:

• No night or surprise searches.

• Villagers have to be warned prior to searches.

• ANA or ANP must accompany U.S. units on searches.

• U.S. soldiers may not fire at the enemy unless the enemy is preparing to fire first.

• U.S. forces cannot engage the enemy if civilians are present.

• Only women can search women.

• Troops can fire at an insurgent if they catch him placing an IED but not if insurgents are walking away from an area where explosives have been laid.

The mission

Without Afghan army or police, Capt. Thoreen and his troops were about to scuttle their mission: a house-to-house search for weapons and insurgents in the poor Pashtun village of Kashk-E Nokhowd, combined with an effort to win over the village's 200 residents by passing out toys, pencils and toiletries.

Finally, a small ragtag group of Afghan police arrived to accompany the Americans. The Afghan army was a no-show.

The police, some of whom who looked as young as 13 in their oversized uniforms, have a poor reputation in the local Maywand district for corruption and extortion.

"I'm guessing it was too early for the Afghan National Army to get up out of bed and help us out," Capt. Thoreen said. "They're probably still asleep. Unbelievable."

"Is everyone accounted for?" he asked. "Let's move — stagger your positions."

As the sun revealed the Red Mountain of Maywand, the soldiers headed out the gate of combat outpost Rath with weapons ready.

They set up a security perimeter near a more than century-old British fortress, whose crumbling walls overshadowed the small outpost.

In 1880, British and Indian forces fought and lost a battle here against Afghan forces led by a girl named Mawali, a Pashtun interpreter told The Times. He asked that his name not be used to protect himself and his family from Taliban retribution.

"She told the men in the village that they were not men if they would not raise their arms to fight the enemy," he said. "They were so embarrassed they went to battle and Pashtun farmers killed more than 6,000 British and Indian soldiers."

The interpreter said this Pashtun Joan of Arc was buried not far from the village. On this day, however, there was not a woman in sight. Under the Taliban's strict interpretation of Islam, women are discouraged from appearing in public and are supposed to be shrouded head to toe in burqas.

Because of the Karzai 12 rules, U.S. forces have had to bring in American women to conduct searches of their Afghan counterparts.

So Cpl. Amy B. King, 42, a medic from Springfield, Mo.; Spc. Dionalyn O. Bird, 29, a cook from Bloomfield, Conn.; Spc. Toni Winkler, 20, a medic from South Carolina; and Sgt. Frevette J. Skelton, 31, a cook, entered the village with Capt. Thoreen's men.

"We have the women say their names before we search them because sometimes it's a man under the burqa," said Cpl. King. "In some cases, there are weapons on them."

"It's OK for the insurgents to use their women to hide weapons but it's not OK for us [men] to search them," said Staff Sgt. Joshua Yost, 27, of Shelton, Wash. "So now, we have to break our own rules and bring women into combat just so they can search the women."

Dusty little faces peered over ancient salmon-colored mud walls as the Americans entered the village. The children giggled and pointed at the soldiers.

"Stop, don't walk any closer," the Pashtun interpreter told a farmer and two boys who emerged from the back of the old British fort. "Stop where you are."

They kept walking in the soldiers' direction but the soldiers did not raise their weapons.

"Stop," the interpreter yelled again. "Don't move."

He then asked the man and boys to lift their traditional tunics to show the soldiers that they were not carrying weapons or explosives. Eventually, they were allowed to pass.

The platoon members spread across and around the fields surrounding the village. An announcement from a dilapidated mosque alerted villagers of the impending search.

"Well, the bad guys know we're coming," said the interpreter, laughing. "They're probably hiding their weapons by now."

Some of the men squatting outside the mosque looked stoic. Others stared in anger.

In the mosque, the soldiers discovered a 9 mm handgun with clips.

A U.S. civil affairs officer, who asked that his name not be revealed because of the nature of his work, said only insurgents carry such handguns. "Everyone here has Kalashnikovs, very few have these," he said.

The mosque's imam, who gave his name as Sahed, walked alongside the U.S. soldiers down a narrow dusty road, followed by a gaggle of children.

"We need help getting clean water," he told Capt. Thoreen through the interpreter. "Water is what is most important."

Civilian aid workers and State Department officials rarely visit Maywand because of security concerns, so development work falls on the U.S. military's shoulders.

"We have to be everything from the soldier to the engineer, water expert to medical care," Capt. Thoreen said.

"We try to hire locals but first we need to secure the region," he said. "We are not going to get the [nongovernmental organizations] out here until we do that."

Imam: U.S. 'needs to go'

Interviewed by The Times, Sahed the imam said U.S. troops were "respectful to his people and provided security."

"I tell my people in the mosque to not become suicide bombers and to not kill those who want to help us," he said.

However, asked about the presence of U.S. troops in his village, Sahed said they "need to go. Get out of Afghanistan or it will never be resolved. Between Islam and the infidel there can never be a relationship."

"In my personal opinion, the Americans won't be able to resolve this problem," he added. "The longer they stay the more likely there will be another attack like Sept. 11. It's only the Afghan people who will be able to resolve this problem."

The next day, however, the imam visited the U.S. combat outpost for the first time, bringing a gift of homemade yogurt candy. He told Capt. Thoreen that he had asked his people to stop targeting the U.S. soldiers.

Capt. Thoreen said he appreciated the gesture but wasn't sure whether the imam was telling the truth.

"To some degree we are trying to pull the people of Maywand back over," he said.

"In some ways, we're not just fighting for their security but our own and those of the ones we love back home."

Then he added, referring to the rules of engagement that his forces try to observe, "For our guys, it's tough. Sometimes they feel they have their hands tied behind their backs."

Contacted by e-mail after The Times' reporter and photographer had returned to the U.S., Capt. Thoreen described a clinic his unit had since hosted, which treated 75 locals including 20 women.

"It was a huge success. The people are becoming much more open and friendly," he said. As evidence of that success, he cited a drop in IED attacks on his soldiers.

On vacation with Mr. Dithers


Share/Save/Bookmark


On vacation with Mr. Dithers
michaelsavage.com





PRUDEN: On vacation with Mr. Dithers
Friday, November 13, 2009

OPINION/ANALYSIS:

Every modern president takes refuge abroad when the going gets rough at home. (Before the jet airplane life was simpler and presidents could get respite with a train trip to Cleveland or Buffalo.) So President Obama is off to Asia, where never will necessarily be heard an encouraging word, but he won't have to listen to criticism in the Queen's English.

His approval ratings are continuing to sink -- down now to 46 percent, measured by reliable Rasmussen Reports. Nancy Pelosi's euphoria over her razor-thin passage of the fanciful House version of Obamacare is fading in the wake of rising Senate opposition to the thousand pages of Mzz Pelosi's poisoned mush. The president continues to dither over what, if anything, to do about the war in Afghanistan, which he once called "the necessary war." Soon he won't be "Mr. President" so much as "Mr. Dithers." (Blondie and Dagwood would recognize him at once.)

But for the next seven days he won't have to listen to his critics, and he can see the sights and work on forging what the White House calls a "co-operative and comprehensive" relationship with China. "Co-operative and comprehensive" is the diplo-speak equivalent of don't ask, don't tell: "We won't ask for anything and we won't tell you what we think about your grim and gruesome record on human rights." Mr. Obama employs the strategy of getting nothing for something.

He prepared for China by stiffing the Dalai Lama when the exiled spiritual leader of Tibet, symbol of the abused and oppressed everywhere yearning to breathe free, came calling. He was the first president to decline to receive the Dalai Lama at the White House. The president's friends describe his snubs of dissidents abroad -- he applauded Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's theft of the Iranian election and only belatedly took note that the election was rigged -- as the work of a foreign-policy advocate of realpolitik, concerned only with the big picture, pretty rhetoric and vague geopolitics. The Chinese will offer the usual diplomatic bloviating in public and be contemptuous of weakness in private, as strong leaders always are.

The president's dithering on what to do in Afghanistan leads only to more opportunities to dither. He now has a controversy in his own house, with his ambassador in Afghanistan scoffing that sending more troops to Kabul will only prop up a corrupt nothingburger government. His commander in Kabul, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, wants thousands more troops for a surge similar to the surge that won the war in Iraq. This is the kind of controversy no president needs, particularly when he's off to impress the world with what a great leader he is. He wouldn't have to suffer such indignities if he could make up his mind. Mr. Dithers has Dagwood Bumstead to blame for his stumbles, but a president doesn't have the luxury of a Dagwood.

The president's dilemma in Afghanistan, says Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, is how to signal American resolve and, at the same time, signal that there really isn't any resolve, only he didn't say it quite that clearly. Mr. Dithers would understand.

Mr. Obama could have arrived in Beijing riding authentic momentum if he had only taken his teleprompter to Berlin for the celebration of the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. He was invited by Angela Merkel, the chancellor of the reunited Germany, to join her and Mikhail Gorbachev, whose reforms hastened the collapse of the old Soviet Union. But Mr. Obama, who found a way to work in a quick trip to Copenhagen to lobby (unsuccessfully) for a Chicago Olympics, was too busy. He sent a videotaped speech in which he studiously avoided mentioning Ronald Reagan, whose flinty resolve to win the Cold War eventually erased that hideous scar of steel and concrete across the Berlin landscape. It's impossible to imagine Barack Obama, as eloquent as he can be, as John F. Kennedy ("ich bin ein Berliner") or Ronald Reagan ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall").

The president promises to return to Copenhagen for the December palaver over a global-warming treaty that he concedes won't mean anything, because a president proposes and the U.S. Senate disposes. But he wants to talk to the Chinese about "frameworks, principles and building blocks" that could, maybe, someday, lead to "ongoing and continuing progress." More pretty palaver from Mr. Dithers.

Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.